The most significant message I could ever share..
Part
One: God’s love
First of all God loves you
with an unconditional
love. It
is much the same kind of love that
we would imagine that
parents should have for their
children; that
is, not how parents
behave all of the time,
but what we
envision the ideal to
be. It
is not because of any sort
of performance on the children’s part
or benefit the
parents might
receive from their children that
the parent
chooses to love the
child. It
is not because they
have been such wonderful children. They
could have little
gratitude for
what the
parent does for them,
be unthankful, threaten
their parents,
and a host of other
things, and the
parent would still
love and serve them. Why? Because
they are their
children and that
alone makes them worthy
of love. Parents
do not reason as such, “they
got themselves
into this
mess, they should get
themselves out.” Nor do they point
fingers at the
system, “the
system makes it
nearly impossible for them to
rise above their circumstances.” No, what matters
is that they
are human beings, and human beings have value and dignity
in themselves, and you must
help, teach, take
responsibility and even go above what
responsibility requires. This type of
love is known as agape, or unconditional love.
Unconditional love is
really the only type
of love there is, or at
least the
only pure kind. Usually what
we describe as love is really just respect
or mutual admiration. I love you because you are like me, we see things
the same way, we have common interests,
or even because you possess something I do not,
but it intrigues
me. But
what if such person discontinued
possessing those things? Would you still
love them?
This is what is referred to
as fileo love in Greek. It
is a love based on some type of merit,
usually a shared interest. It must
be noted at this
time that
all other religions besides Christianity
(and this only true
Christianity
without any
of its modern distortions),
are based on the fileo type
of love. God only loves you if…God only
accepts you if…You will get
to Nirvana if you do this…You
will be with 72 virgins if…But
what man yearns for is a God who accepts
him just as he is, even with
all his imperfections and failings. However, all man-made religions cannot
contemplate
God being this kind to
them, and so they
come up with some type
of system whereby they
must earn or merit
God’s love and favor.
Another type
of love is called eros, and is the love based
on sexual attraction
and appetite. This type of
love also demands some type of good from the
other person.
It demands physical attraction
and sexual fulfillment. It is an
erratic type
of love, though often
useful, but must
be replaced by agape love if, for instance, a
marriage has any hope of surviving - for eros love has the
nasty habit
of disappearing over a length of time,
once the infatuation
period has ended.
Another part
of God’s love is his justice. If God is love, love also demands that
God is just.
For example, let’s hypothetically
say that you
were raped, and a year later your court
case came up. You are at
the trial. The defendant
is brought up, and pleads guilty. However, he claims, “I have been a good
person all the days before I raped the
victim, and all the
days afterwards as well. Therefore, you should let
me go.” The judge contemplates
for a minute, and decides, “Sounds good to
me, just don’t
do it again. Case dismissed!”
How would that
make you feel? I assume you would be outraged. Why is this? Because the
judge was a bad judge; he did not serve his duty. Justice was
not served.
The time should fit
the crime, and so on. Just like it
does not matter
how well you drive all the other
days of your life, if you drive drunk one time
and kill someone, there must
be consequences for your actions. Something
inside us yearns for justice to
be done for wrongdoing, and so it is the
same with God.
In fact, it
would be unloving for God to be an absentee
judge and allow his children to be abused in
such a way as to allow no justice
for crimes committed. So we are God’s children that
have been trespassed against,
but in many instances
we are also the trespassers
themselves.
Part
2: Separation
Now you may have noticed that
I nearly contradicted
myself. First
I talked about
unconditional love, then
I talked about
justice.
The two seem to
be opposed to each other. And isn’t this
the tension that
we live in our entire lives? We wonder what
of our actions will benefit
a person more; if we retaliate
fire with fire, we think
they will get
the point and
realize that there
are consequences to their
actions.
If someone commits a crime, don’t
we reward them with
a punishment in accordance with
the crime?
That seems to
be merit according to
what a person does or does not
do. On the
other hand, we can give mercy to
a person, and hope that
our love for them is contagious. It causes them
to not even
desire to do such evil again, because they
have had their needs met
by our kindness.
Backing up for a minute, we
see a problem that
exists.
The defendant wanted
to be excused for the
crime because of his behavior before and after
the crime.
But judges and juries do not
reason according to the
actions of the
defendant like this. Their one and only job is to
determine whether
the crime was in fact
committed. A man’s lifestyle
all the days of his life before and after
a crime do not matter
to them.
Now, you are
the perpe
tra
tor
of
the crime, God is your judge, and you have
been
trying
to
be acqui
tted
by saying
tha
t
you have been a good person all
the days
before and all
the days af
ter
you commi
tted
various moral and spiri
tual crimes. This me
thod
is called, “righ
teousness by law,” or a
ttemp
ting
to asser
t
your innocence by appealing
to
the
s
tandards of
the
law. However,
this
provides innocence for no one, in fac
t, i
t
proves guil
t ins
tead. Paul, one of
the
wri
ters of
the
Bible, def
tly wro
te, "Now we know that whatever the Law says, it speaks to those who are under the Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all the world may become accountable to God; because by works of the Law no flesh will be justified in his sight; for through the law comes the knowledge of sin." These words are found in the book of Paul to the Romans Chapter 3; they basically assert that no one can earn God's favor by saying they are worthy, in fact, based on our own efforts we prove ourselves to be unworthy. Yet most people daftly assert otherwise, that their good deeds should earn them the favor of their friends, family, and God.
Most folks, knowingly or
unknowingly, start
with the ten
commandments as a benchmark, and conveniently
forget the
commandments that
they have broken. That is why
when I ask a person who claims to be a good
person why they consider themselves
to be good, they
often answer, “Well, I’ve never killed
anyone!” But
how did the 10 commandments
boil down to the
one? If you don’t
ignore several of them, I think
you’ll find out that
you are in fact guilty
of several of them. Here then,
is the list:
1. Idolatry
– holding someone or something as higher in
importance than
God and therefore more worthy
of our worship, devotion, time,
energy, thoughts,
or money
2. Taking God’s name in Vain –
Misrepresenting God and the
authority His
name represents.
3. Remembering the
Sabbath and keeping it
holy – God commanded the Israelites
to do no work for one entire
day of the week. This demonstrated
their trust
in God to provide for them,
as well as gave them a chance to
rest from their
labor. There is significant
debate over whether
Christians are under the
Sabbath.
My position is that
they are not;
Jesus Christ is our rest,
but that
is not within
the scope of our discussion. Suffice to
say, I do not think
Sabbath keeping is a moral absolute,
so will set it
aside for this discussion.
4. Honor your father
and mother – to
respect the
dignity and authority
that parent’s
have and not try
to usurp it.
5. You shall not
murder – Jesus ups the ante
by saying that
if you have harbored anger in your heart towards
another person, then
you have committed
murder.
6. You shall not
commit adultery
– Jesus again ups the ante,
saying that
if you have looked at a woman with
lust in your heart,
you have committed
adultery.
The inverse goes for the ladies. In essence, all sexual sins would be
encapsulated by the
term “adultery,”
whether that
be fornication, indulging in pornography, or
various other lusts
of the flesh
7. You shall not
steal – taking
something that
does not belong to
you without
permission.
8. Bearing false witness
– This is simply not telling
the truth,
lying.
9. Covetousness
– The desire for something that
belongs to someone else.
Most folks will agree that
these laws as found in the
Bible and in the Jewish Torah are moral truth. There is not
much dispute because our consciences corroborate
the story that
the 10 commandments
are saying. Another
command, found in both the
Old and New Testament,
also rings true to
us.
"'YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND.'" This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, 'YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.'" (Matthew 22:37-39, also found in the Old Testament in Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18)
So I ask you, have you ever, at
any time, committed
any of these crimes? Have you ever broken a single command? Obeying God’s commands are not
simply avoiding what we shouldn’t
do, but as in the
example of loving God and our neighbors, they
are also not doing what
we should have done. When deciding whether
you are a good person or not, the
question is not,
“have I ever done wrong?,” but “have I always
done right?,”
“Have I always done what I should have
done?”
If you were driving to an
appointment,
and on your way you went past
someone drowning in a lake and screaming for help, would you have a duty
to help that
person? What
if you kept driving because you were late? Why would you feel guilty? Because that
would also be considered a breech of the law
by anyone with any moral fabric. So to be
vindicated by the
law, you wouldn’t simply have to
avoid committing
any sins, but you would have to
not omit
any sins either.
If you still aren’t
convinced that
you have ever broken a command, stop
reading. Jesus has nothing
to offer you.
His offer is to broken sinners, not
upright citizens.
The method known as righteousness
by law, we now see, has most unpleasant
consequences in that
no human being has ever been able to be righteous
through this
method of appeal. Paul writes,
“For all have sinned and fall short of the
glory of God” (Romans 3:23). What Paul is
saying here, is that
God’s standard is perfection;
you fall short of that
standard. Only foolish people try
to attain
the standard
even though they
have already fallen short. It’s like a test
where you have to score 100% to
pass and you’ve already missed several questions
at the
beginning of the test;
it does not
matter how
many more questions you answer correctly,
you will still fail the
test.
A penalty exists
for breaking God’s law. What
is the penalty
for breaking God’s law? The Bible says it
is death.
“For the wages of sin is death”
(Romans 6:23a). Why does this
make sense? Firstly,
if we cannot be in God’s presence on account
of our imperfection, then
we cannot experience life, as God is ultimately
the giver of life. God can delay our punishment,
but until then
we are like prisoners on death row, waiting
to be executed. Secondly, if we are rebellious toward
God, then obviously until
we cease to be rebels can we be reunited
with Him.
Thirdly, if we are enemies of God’s will, then
we cannot in all honesty
be on His side and partaker’s of His kingdom.
If we are helpless to
change our guilty sentence,
then we are stuck. But is there
anything God can do? God is in an interesting
position, which I do not
know how to describe more reverently
except by saying that
there is a certain
type of tension. God wants to
love like a father that
loves unconditionally, but
also carries the characteristic
of being just.
Part three:
God’s Provision
Jesus is God’s only provision for man’s sin problem. If sin is really what
separates us from God, than
Jesus is surely the only solution
that has ever
been proffered. All other
religions must blindly ignore God’s justice,
which as we discussed, is a subdivision of His love. Jesus is God’s perfect
solution to
being perfectly loving and perfectly
just at the
same time.
1 Peter 3:18 tells us
how God was able to do this. “For Christ
died for sins once for all, the just
for the unjust,
so that He
might bring us to
God.”
Romans 3:23-26 tells us:
“For all have sinned and fall short of the
glory of God, being justified as a gift
by His grace which is in Christ Jesus; whom
God displayed publicly as a propitiation
in His blood through faith. This was to
demonstrate
His righteousness, because in the
forbearance of God He passed over the sins
previously committed;
for the demonstration,
I say, of His righteousness, at
the present time,
so that He
would be just and the
justifier of the
one who has faith in Jesus.”
Coupled together,
these statements
by Peter and Paul are in complete
harmony regarding God’s solution, which was to
have Jesus Christ die in our place for our
sins. In theological
terms, this
is known as “penal substitutionary
atonement.” Jesus atoned,
or, made restitution
for our sins.
A couple uncommon terms
occur in Paul’s statement. One is Propitiation,
which is a means of appeasing God’s wrath (wrath
being a desire to punish an offense) for our
sin problem. Jesus is our propitiation. He took the
penalty for our sin so that
we don’t have to. The other
fancy word is justifier. This means that
God can declare us innocent, much like how a
jury declares a defendant to
be innocent. The penalty
for mankind’s sin has already been poured out
on Jesus when he died on a cross in 29 A.D. (or thereabouts),
therefore God is free to
declare man innocent as justice
has already been served. If you have
been justified, than
in Biblical terms, you have been declared righteous,
moral, innocent, and perfect.
But how can Jesus take
on a penalty that
is rightly due to
us? When coming up with
analogies, the traffic
court is a simple analogy, thought
perhaps not totally
satisfying.
It is as though
you have a penalty for a traffic
violation to
be paid, but don’t
have the money in order to
pay it.
If you don’t pay it,
you’ll have to serve a prison sentence. But what
if the judge on the
case were your father? In an act of
love towards you, he steps
off the bench and takes
off his official garments in order to
act as an ordinary citizen. He says, “I know you don’t
have the money to
pay the fine on your own, so I am paying it
for you.” That’s
kind of how it works with
Jesus.
However, in criminal cases, someone cannot
step in for another. In our western
court setting,
justice is only satisfied
if the perpetrator
of the crime serves the
sentence.
So we are back at the
same question, how can Jesus rightly
pay a penalty that
is due to us?
I confess, I not totally
sure, but I will give you my best
theories.
God has been totally
faithful and trustworthy
to me thus
far, so at this
one concept that
I do not understand,
I take Him at
His word.
The key here may be representation. When Adam sinned, he represented
all mankind. When he fell, we all bore the
consequences of His sin. It
may be the same with
Jesus. He is like a second Adam. He represents
all mankind, being the Son of Man. If he dies, he represents
all mankind, and all our sins. If he is
raised to life, we too
can all be raised to life. It is much
like how you must bear the
consequences of things your parents
have done, whether good or bad, even before
you are born. If I was born in Alaska
as opposed to Washington,
my life would look quite different
as it does now, though
not as a result
of anything I did. The friends I have, sports
I play, educational and job opportunities
that are
presented to
me would all be different and apart
from my choosing. I would also receive a
check from the state
government every year simply for being a
resident of Alaska. That would
be nice.
Another theory
I like is that
if death is the
punishment to
be served, it can either
be served by a finite being for an infinite
amount of time
(as in humans), or by an infinite being for a
finite amount
of time (as in Jesus). Either way, the
penalty must
be served. We could talk
about other theories,
like Jesus being a sacrifice, much like the
Old Testament
sacrificical system, but
the key here is to
understand that
Jesus satisfied the
penalty for man’s sin problem, whereas man on
his own could not rectify
the problem.
Part
4: Man’s Response
It is not
only that
Jesus made it “possible” to
have eternal life in God’s presence; what
he did was “enough.” It
is often (though
not often
enough) said that
Christianity
is not about
what you do for God, it
is about what
God has done for you. Most
people churches, teachers, still
get this backwards
today.
They think man comes to
God by offering something to
God. This is incorrect
and heretical. Man comes to
God by receiving something from God.
What Jesus did is complete,
final, finished, and totally
adequate.
People often (though
not often
enough) speak of “the finished work of Christ.” It cannot
be added to or improved in any way. It is something
man can receive the benefits
of on the basis of a gift;
it cannot be
received in any other way. It is not
an exchange for future good deeds, commitment,
obeying of the commandments,
or discontinuation
of sin.
Paul writes in Romans
4:4-5: Now to the
one who works, his wage is not credited
as a favor, but as what
is due, But to
the one who does not
work, but believes in Him who justifies
the ungodly, his faith
is credited as righteousness.” Paul uses a simple analogy from every day
life. When you work 8 hours a day to
an agreed upon wage, and you receive a paycheck every 2 weeks, you do not
say to your boss, “Oh, thank
you for this indescribable gift!” You say, “Gimme that,
I earned it!”
What Paul is explaining, is that
God’s righteousness cannot
be approached in the same way as earning a
wage. Remember, this
is because it has nothing
to do with
what you did, or what
you earned. All you added to
the equation
was the sins – the
bad part!
God was the one who had to
rectify your problem. You did not
contribute
anything of value to
the equation. Therefore, you have to
rely on what God did for you, and stop
relying on what you do for God. Otherwise,
you cannot have eternal
life.
What the
work of Christ does is put
God in the position
to offer grace. Grace (mentioned
in Romans 3:24 above) is the
most important
term we have come to
so far. It
is God’s unmerited favor and love. It is like the
unconditional love of a parent
that we talked
about at the
beginning, but applied to
God.
Paul writes to
a group of Christians in Ephesians 2:8-9 which
sums it up well: “For by grace you have been
saved through faith;
and that not
of yourselves, it is the
gift of God, not
as a result of works, so that
no one may boast.” The way that
we access God’s grace is “through faith.” Actually, in
the Bible “faith”
and “believe” mean the same thing,
only faith is a noun and believe is a
verb. This is how John 3:16 and Ephesians 2:8-9 can be true
at the same time. Man’s response is to
believe in Jesus, to have faith
in Him and what He did.
A good example of the
appropriate response to
Christ’s work, is that
it is like a clutch
in a car. The clutch
in no way powers the car, the
engine does that. The clutch
is merely the way in which one can access the
power which is already available. God’s
grace as manifested in Jesus Christ
is what powers salvation;
our faith is merely the
access point.
Another example is the
dishwashing analogy. It
is as though you are responsible for cleaning the
dishes, yet the
amount of dishes to
clean is so great, that
as you continue to
load the dishwasher, you get
hungry, have to eat,
and create more dirty
dishes. In fact,
for arguments sake let’s
say that the
rate at which
you create dirty
dishes is greater than
the rate at
which you are able to load them. You admit that
it is your responsibility
to clean the
dishes, yet you have no ability
in yourself to ever complete
the job.
Dismayed, you finally give up.
Hours later, your brother
comes to you and says, “I have good news for
you – though you were unable to
complete your responsibility
of loading the dishwasher, someone with
superior skill has come into the
house and has done the dishes for you.”
If you are in this position,
you actually have a couple options,
though only one is reasonable. You could continue
trying to
clean the dishes, which would be extremely
foolish, both because they
are already clean, and because all you ever succeeded at
was creating more dirty
dishes. The other
option is that
you could rely on the work of another. This is what
it means to trust
in Christ.
You rely on the work of another.
Someone may say, “I believe in Christ,”
or “I have faith in Christ,”
but what they
really mean is that
they believe Jesus is the
Son of God. This is necessary to
true belief, but
not enough.
True belief is taking God at
His word. He says plainly in His word,
some 150 times, that
He can give you salvation as a free gift
because Jesus Christ died for your sins, and
all you need to do is believe in His Son. We
need to take
Him at His word on this
point.
Many people believe Jesus is the Son of
God, but their
trust is in
some other object
to get them
to eternal
life and a relationship with
God, usually themselves. This is not
faith in Christ,
this is faith
in self. The object
of faith must
be Jesus, it must
in no way rest on any other
hope, otherwise it
is useless and something less than
faith.
Paul elaborates on faith.
“For this reason it
is by faith, in order that
it may be in accordance with
grace” (Romans 4:16). Faith is the
only response that
can possibly be congruent with
grace! It
is the only human response which adds nothing
deserving of merit to
the equation. It is merely
the reception
of a gift.
All other responses which are often
promoted – “turning
from your sins”, “give your life to Christ,”
or “commit your life to
Christ” are anti-grace,
they have the
equation backwards! Christ died
for your sins, He gave His life for us, and He committed
His life to mankind, so they
we would not have to
bear the consequences of our sin problem.
Many people say we must
repent of our sins to
come to Christ,
and by this they
mean we must first
turn from our lifestyle
of sin before we can have a relationship with
Christ.
This is incorrect. It is like trying
to clean off before getting
in the shower, or wiping before you poop, or trying
to tow a truck
by a trailer.
More importantly,
if someone had to turn
from their sins in order to
accept Christ,
than salvation
would be something earnable and no longer a
gift.
What were asked to
repent of is dead works. The writer
of Hebrews accurately describes the
foundation of the
Christian faith
as “repentance from dead works and faith
toward God” (Hebrews 6:1). According to
all Bible dictionaries, the
primary idea of repentance is a change of
mind. When someone accepts
Christ as their
personal Savior, they change their
mind as to the
value of their good deeds. Before they saw
good deeds as something to
earn God’s favor; in light of Christ’s
work on the cross they
must disavow that
their good deeds have any value and trust
in Christ’s good work instead.
If you have never trusted
in Christ alone, I invite
you to do that
right now.
If you do, He will surely give you forgiveness of sins, eternal
life, a dwelling place in heaven, and will even credit
His own righteousness to
you. I know, because His word promises it.
“For God did not send the
Son into the
world to judge the
world, but that
the world might
be saved through Him…Whoever believes in the
Son has eternal life, but
whoever rejects the
Son will not see life, for God’s wrath
remains on them.” (John 3:17, 36)